----- Original Message -----

From: William E. Nixon

To: 'Dave Dellow'

Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:57 PM

Subject: RE:

Mr. Dellow,

Whether you believe it or not and appreciate it or not, I understand your frustration.  

That frustration however does not permit you to be disrespectful and nasty on the phone and your communication below is no better. 

If you wish to finance a general meeting of the shareholders I would agree to it under the following conditions:

1. Senco requires funds to pay for prior auditing firm fees,
2. Fees to audit FYE 2002 and FYE 2003 and
3. Fees and other costs associated with calling and attending a shareholders meeting.  

You can place a deposit of $50,000 with our corporate counsel at Miller Thompson, who would of course have fees related to this process. 

Regards,

William Nixon

President & CEO, Senco Sensors, Inc.

 Tel: 1-800-858-0158

 Rated #1 by Consumer Reports

Senco Model One CO Alarm

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Dellow [mailto:djdellow@shaw.ca]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:31 PM
To: wenixon@sencosensors.com
Subject:

  Hello Mr  Bill Nixon

 I sympathize with the  situation SSZ  is  in. But  what I do not  sympathize with is  how  you  have  turned this into  your  own  private  company. As I stated  on the  phone  you  have a responsibility  to hold an  annual  meeting  of the  rightfull  shareholders  of  SSZ. Instead  you  have  chosen  to evade  them. I have  left  repeated  messages  which  you  have  not  returned. You  mention  that  you  cannot  provide  a  financial statement. This is  absolutely  ludicrous to  have a  business  that  does produce  a record  of its  business  transactions. I think  you are likely also a tax  evader. To simply take  off with the  company to a  foreign  country  does  not  make   what  you have  done  legal. You appear to be  a sneaky, dishonest person. An  honest  person  would  have  notified  the  shareholders  of the  situation the  company  was in. You  did  not. An  honest  person  would  return  phone  calls  from  its  shareholders, you  did  not. An honest  person  would  notify  shareholders of  how the  company is  doing  business,  you did  not. There  are  means  available, Stock house  bulletin board<  where you  could  post,  free of  charge,  information regarding  the  company, a business  plan ( or  intension) , information  about  the Patent lawsuit, etc etc etc  But  you are a sneaky dishonest person who  has  just  chosen to go  underground  with OUR  company for your  own  personal  gain.

 You stated that  if  someone  came  up  with $50,000 you  would  hold an  annual  meeting. I don't  think  you  would. You certainly have NOT indicated that you are an HONEST person and  would  likely  just  put that  cash in your  pocket. You  don't  have  any intension, from  what you  have  told  me to return the  company to  its  shareholders,  should   it   become  profitable. How  would  you  define  profitable ,  when you don't  even  produce a profit and  loss  statement, or  any  financial  information. You are acting like many of the other White Collar Corporate Executives that are now in US Courts because of their "Criminal Activities". I would  feel  much better if the  company  was in  fact  bankrupt, not  just in  hiding.

I feel like  I have  been  violated  twice.

David Dellow

Hello George.

I am  concerned  that a "Shady Dishonest Character" like Bill Nixon,  might  try to  sue  me  for  slander, if in  fact  one  can  be,  for  calling  a snake, a  snake.

 

The  comments  contained  are the  opinion  of David Dellow,

 

I am concerned that Bill  may see  me as  an  irritant rebel. I am not, I am a shareholder that  purchased  shares in a company in  good  faith. I had the  misunderstanding that  regulatory  agencies  actually  would  ensure compliance  with  the  laws  of the  land. I was  wrong. Regulatory  agencies  wield no  power  whatsoever. Their  ultimate  power  being to delist a public  company. In this  case  it  has  allowed a public  company to become  private company by denying the  shareholders  any  access to previous information. Sedar  no  longer  recognizes SSZ as a  company. It  denies the  shareholders the  means, other  than a  lawsuit to  force  compliance  of the  company.  My  view  is that  stocks  should  never  be  halted , other  than  pending  news, and  then  only  for a  max of  24Hrs and the  market  should  decide  what the  stock is  worth at  any  point in time. Denial of  trading  simply removes  any hope the  investor has of managing  his  investment IE holding  an annual  meeting  and  punting the  management. I see  SSZ as  not an individual case, but a serious loophole in stock  market enforcement. If the  current  management does  not  follow the  rules, a more  appropriate  punishment  might  be to enforce an  immediate  meeting  of the  shareholders and  re-election  of  management, Seizure  of  managements  stock and  cancellation  of  options and  warrants  held  by  management.  If  this  type  of  power  was  wielded  by the  exchange I think  enforcement   would  not be  a problem. The  present  system  leaves  the   most  vulnerable, the  individual  shareholder, at  an  extreme disadvantage. Senco Sensors  is  just a case in  point! I view  the conversation  with Bill Nixon  and  his  subsequent  E mail as  extortion.  It is  my  opinion  the  shareholders, if  given the  opportunity  to  vote, would  either  elect  new  management,  or  bankrupt the  company rater  than  be  duped  out of their  investment.

 

David Dellow

 

 

 

Senco Sensors "Current" Stock Market Status:

	    BULLETIN TYPE:  Cease Trade Order
	    BULLETIN DATE:  January 28, 2003

	    Symbol   Tier  Company                  Failure to File           Period
	                                                                      Ending
	                                                                     (Y/M/D)

	    ("CGY")   2    Cie-Nergy Ply-Foil       Comparative Financial
	                    Canada Inc.              Statement (x)           02/08/31

	    ("MUA")   2    Mutapa Copper & Cobalt Inc.

	    ("NMA")   2    Noise Media Inc.

	    ("SSZ")   2    Senco Sensors Inc.

Upon revocation of the Cease Trade Order, the companies' shares will

remain suspended until the companies meet TSX Venture Exchange requirements.
Members are prohibited from trading in the securities of the companies during
the period of the suspension or until further notice.

Back to "Ask an Expert"     Return to Main Page